{"id":1194,"date":"2024-09-21T13:48:42","date_gmt":"2024-09-21T13:48:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/?p=1194"},"modified":"2024-10-13T11:38:32","modified_gmt":"2024-10-13T08:38:32","slug":"1194","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/?p=1194","title":{"rendered":"Soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Reddi Davas\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"1024\" class=\"wp-image-1195\" src=\"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/sanat-sahne-giyim-adam-insan-iceren-bir-resim.png\" alt=\"sanat, sahne, giyim, adam, insan i\u00e7eren bir resim A\u00e7\u0131klama otomatik olarak olu\u015fturuldu\" srcset=\"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/sanat-sahne-giyim-adam-insan-iceren-bir-resim.png 1024w, https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/sanat-sahne-giyim-adam-insan-iceren-bir-resim-300x300.png 300w, https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/sanat-sahne-giyim-adam-insan-iceren-bir-resim-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/sanat-sahne-giyim-adam-insan-iceren-bir-resim-768x768.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/strong><\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Reddi Davas\u0131<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a id=\"post-1194-_Hlk173179669\"><\/a> Soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi davas\u0131, bir \u00e7ocu\u011fun hukuken tan\u0131nan babas\u0131n\u0131n asl\u0131nda biyolojik baba olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispatlamaya y\u00f6nelik a\u00e7\u0131lan bir davad\u0131r. Bu dava, \u00e7ocu\u011fun babas\u0131 oldu\u011funu iddia eden ki\u015finin, babal\u0131k karinesinin \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi amac\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131labilir. \u0130lgili ki\u015filer \u015funlard\u0131r:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Koca:<\/strong> Soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi davas\u0131 a\u00e7arak babal\u0131k karinesini \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctebilir.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Ana veya \u00c7ocuk:<\/strong> \u00c7ocuk, ana veya di\u011fer ilgililer, babal\u0131k karinesinin \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini talep edebilirler.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>B. Ana Rahmine D\u00fc\u015fme<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Evli Kad\u0131nlar\u0131n Durumu (Madde 287)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00c7ocuk, evlilik i\u00e7inde ana rahmine d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcyse, baban\u0131n baba olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispat y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc davac\u0131ya aittir. Evlilikten itibaren en az 180 g\u00fcn ge\u00e7tikten sonra veya evlili\u011fin sona ermesinden itibaren en fazla 300 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde do\u011fan \u00e7ocuk, evlilik i\u00e7inde ana rahmine d\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r. Bu durumda, kocan\u0131n baba olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispatlamak zorundad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00d6rnek:<\/strong> Bir kad\u0131n evli oldu\u011fu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde hamile kal\u0131r ve do\u011fumdan \u00f6nce evlilik devam ediyorsa, \u00e7ocu\u011fun babas\u0131 olarak kabul edilen koca, \u00e7ocu\u011fun biyolojik babas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispatlamak zorundad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Evlenmeden \u00d6nce veya Ayr\u0131 Ya\u015fama S\u0131ras\u0131nda Ana Rahmine D\u00fc\u015fme (Madde 288)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00c7ocuk, evlenmeden \u00f6nce veya e\u015fler ayr\u0131 ya\u015farken ana rahmine d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcyse, davac\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fka bir kan\u0131t getirmesine gerek yoktur. Ancak, gebe kalma d\u00f6neminde kocan\u0131n kar\u0131s\u0131 ile cinsel ili\u015fkide bulundu\u011funa dair inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 kan\u0131tlar varsa, kocan\u0131n babal\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin karine ge\u00e7erlili\u011fini korur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>C. Hak D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc S\u00fcreler (Madde 289)<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Koca i\u00e7in S\u00fcreler:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Koca, do\u011fumu ve baba olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenme tarihinden itibaren bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde, ya da 18 ya\u015f\u0131na giren \u00e7ocuk, ergin olduktan sonra bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde dava a\u00e7mal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/li>\n<li>Gecikmeyi hakl\u0131 k\u0131lan bir sebep varsa, bir y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcre bu sebebin ortadan kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten itibaren i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>D. Karinelerin \u00c7ak\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 (Madde 290)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00c7ocuk, evlili\u011fin sona ermesinden sonra 300 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde do\u011fmu\u015f ve ana yeniden evlenmi\u015fse, ikinci evlilikteki koca baba olarak kabul edilir. Bu karine \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcrse, ilk evlilikteki koca baba say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>E. Di\u011fer \u0130lgililerin Dava Hakk\u0131 (Madde 291)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dava a\u00e7ma s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7mesinden \u00f6nce koca \u00f6l\u00fcrse, gaipli\u011fine karar verilirse veya s\u00fcrekli olarak ay\u0131rt etme g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fc kaybederse, kocan\u0131n altsoyu, anas\u0131, babas\u0131 veya baba oldu\u011funu iddia eden ki\u015fi, do\u011fumu ve kocan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc \u00f6\u011frenmelerinden itibaren bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilir. Ergin olmayan \u00e7ocu\u011fa atanacak kayy\u0131m da benzer s\u00fcreler i\u00e7inde dava a\u00e7abilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>F. Sonradan Evlenme (Madde 292-294)<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Ko\u015fulu (Madde 292):<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda do\u011fan \u00e7ocuk, ana ve babas\u0131n\u0131n evlenmesi durumunda evlilik i\u00e7inde do\u011fan \u00e7ocuklara ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmlere t\u00e2bi olur.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Bildirim (Madde 293):<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>E\u015fler, evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda do\u011fmu\u015f \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131 evlenme s\u0131ras\u0131nda veya sonras\u0131nda, yerle\u015fim yerlerindeki n\u00fcfus memuruna bildirmek zorundad\u0131r. Bildirim yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, \u00e7ocu\u011fun evlilik i\u00e7inde do\u011fmu\u015f \u00e7ocuklara ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmlere tabi olmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemez.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>\u0130tiraz ve \u0130ptal (Madde 294):<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Ana ve baban\u0131n yasal miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131, \u00e7ocuk ve Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131, sonradan evlenme yoluyla soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kurulmas\u0131na itiraz edebilir. \u0130tiraz eden ki\u015fi, kocan\u0131n baba olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispatlamak zorundad\u0131r. \u00c7ocu\u011fun altsoyu, \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015f veya ay\u0131rt etme g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fc kaybetmi\u015f olmas\u0131 durumunda itiraz hakk\u0131na sahiptir.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Dava Hangi Mahkemede A\u00e7\u0131l\u0131r?<\/td>\n<td>Davac\u0131n\u0131n ve daval\u0131n\u0131n dava veya \u00e7ocu\u011fun do\u011fumu s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki yerle\u015fim yeri Aile Mahkemesi.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\ud83d\udc64 Husumet Kime Y\u00f6neltilir?<\/td>\n<td>Koca,ana, \u00e7ocuk veya kanunda say\u0131lan di\u011fer ilgililer.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\ud83d\udcd1 Dava Konusu<\/td>\n<td>Hukuken tan\u0131nan baban\u0131n asl\u0131nda biyolojik baba olmamas\u0131..<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\ud83d\udcdc Dayanak Maddeler<\/td>\n<td>T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu 286-294..<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\ud83d\udd0d \u0130spat Y\u00f6ntemleri<\/td>\n<td>Dna Testi,Do\u011fum Kay\u0131lar\u0131..<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1654\" height=\"795\" class=\"wp-image-1196\" src=\"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/ic-mekan-zemin-kisi-sahis-iceren-bir-resim-aci-7.jpeg\" alt=\"i\u00e7 mekan, zemin, ki\u015fi, \u015fah\u0131s i\u00e7eren bir resim A\u00e7\u0131klama otomatik olarak olu\u015fturuldu\" srcset=\"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/ic-mekan-zemin-kisi-sahis-iceren-bir-resim-aci-7.jpeg 1654w, https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/ic-mekan-zemin-kisi-sahis-iceren-bir-resim-aci-7-300x144.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/ic-mekan-zemin-kisi-sahis-iceren-bir-resim-aci-7-1024x492.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/ic-mekan-zemin-kisi-sahis-iceren-bir-resim-aci-7-768x369.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/ic-mekan-zemin-kisi-sahis-iceren-bir-resim-aci-7-1536x738.jpeg 1536w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1654px) 100vw, 1654px\" \/><strong>\u00d6rnek Yarg\u0131tay Kararlar\u0131<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong><em>2.Hukuk Dairesi 2022\/1698 E. , 2022\/3261 K. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6zet:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Olay:<\/strong> Davac\u0131, n\u00fcfusta \u00e7ocu\u011fu olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcnen ki\u015finin biyolojik babas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia ederek soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi, davan\u0131n hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcrenin ge\u00e7mesi nedeniyle reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131 bu karara itiraz etmi\u015f ve istinaf mahkemesi de itiraz\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Yerel Mahkeme Karar\u0131:<\/strong> Mahkeme, davan\u0131n hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davay\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir. \u0130stinaf mahkemesi de bu karar\u0131 onam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Yarg\u0131tay Karar\u0131:<\/strong> Yarg\u0131tay, soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi davas\u0131n\u0131n hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcresinin ne zaman ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda \u201c\u00f6\u011frenme\u201d olgusunun yeterli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. Yarg\u0131tay, babal\u0131k raporlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenme tarihinden itibaren s\u00fcreyi ba\u015flataca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme, davan\u0131n s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair de\u011ferlendirmenin yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve DNA testi yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek ilk derece mahkemesinin karar\u0131n\u0131 bozmu\u015ftur:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8221; \u2026Dava, soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi istemine ili\u015fkindir. Davac\u0131, n\u00fcfusta kayden \u00e7ocu\u011fu olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcnen ki\u015finin babas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir. Mahkemece davan\u0131n hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre ge\u00e7tikten sonra a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015ftur. \u0130stinaf incelemesi yapan b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi hukuk dairesince istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Geni\u015f anlamda soyba\u011f\u0131 bir kimsenin \u00fcst soyu ile olan kan ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131; dar anlamda soyba\u011f\u0131 ise, bir kimsenin sadece ana-babas\u0131yla aras\u0131ndaki biyolojik ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmektedir. Bir ki\u015fi (\u00e7ocuk) ile kendilerinden biyolojik (genetik) olarak t\u00fcremi\u015f oldu\u011fu ki\u015filer aras\u0131ndaki ba\u011fa do\u011fal soyba\u011f\u0131 (biyolojik nesep), hukuk d\u00fczeni taraf\u0131ndan aranan baz\u0131 ko\u015fullar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesiyle, bir \u00e7ocu\u011fun hukuki olarak bir ana-babaya ba\u011flanmas\u0131 sonucunda, ana-baba ile \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131nda kurulan bu hukuki ili\u015fkiye ise hukuki soyba\u011f\u0131 (hukuki nesep) denir. <\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Buna g\u00f6re soyba\u011f\u0131, bir kimseyle ana-babas\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki do\u011fal ve\/veya hukuki ba\u011f olarak tan\u0131mlanmaktad\u0131r. 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu\u2019na g\u00f6re, \u00e7ocuk ile anne aras\u0131ndaki hukuki soyba\u011f\u0131 do\u011fumla; \u00e7ocuk ile baba aras\u0131ndaki hukuki soyba\u011f\u0131 ise anneyle evlilik, tan\u0131ma, babal\u0131k davas\u0131nda verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm veya evlat edinmeyle kurulmaktad\u0131r. Baba ile \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131nda evlilik i\u00e7inde do\u011fmaya, babal\u0131k karinesine (TMK mad. 285), dayal\u0131 olarak hukuken kurulmu\u015f bulunan soyba\u011f\u0131 ili\u015fkisinin ortadan kalkmas\u0131 ancak soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi ile s\u00f6z konusu olabilmektedir. Soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi davas\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015far\u0131ya ula\u015farak \u00e7ocuk ile babas\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kalkmas\u0131 sonucunda \u00e7ocuk, baba y\u00f6n\u00fcnden soyba\u011f\u0131 bulunmayan \u00e7ocuk stat\u00fcs\u00fcne girer. Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 25.06.2009 tarihli ve 2008\/30 Esas, 2009\/96 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, ki\u015finin genetik-biyolojik k\u00f6keni kendisine ait olmayan \u00e7ocu\u011fu reddetme hakk\u0131 en temel haklar\u0131ndan birisidir. 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun 286. maddesinde, kocan\u0131n, \u00e7ocuk ve anne aleyhine a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi davas\u0131 ile babal\u0131k karinesini \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctebilece\u011fi; 289. maddesinde ise kocan\u0131n soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi davas\u0131n\u0131 do\u011fumu ve baba olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya anan\u0131n gebe kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada ba\u015fka bir erkek ile cinsel ili\u015fkide bulundu\u011funu \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi tarihten ba\u015flayarak bir y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde a\u00e7mas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, gecikmeyi hakl\u0131 k\u0131lan sebepler varsa bir y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcrenin bu sebebin ortadan kalkmas\u0131ndan sonra ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131 h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi davas\u0131nda, davan\u0131n hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda ve davan\u0131n temellendirilmesinde belirleyici olan \u201c\u00f6\u011frenmenin\u201d, ne zaman ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi noktas\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcphenin \u00f6\u011frenme a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yeterli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerinde durulmal\u0131d\u0131r. Yerle\u015fik Yarg\u0131tay uygulamalar\u0131nda, yarg\u0131lama d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda elde edilmi\u015f babal\u0131k raporlar\u0131na \u00f6zellikle hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre niteli\u011findeki dava a\u00e7ma s\u00fcresinin \u00f6\u011frenme tarihinden itibaren ba\u015flamas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte yani \u00f6\u011frenmenin yarg\u0131lama d\u0131\u015f\u0131 babal\u0131k testi ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi an\u0131nda hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcrenin ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmektedir. Sonu\u00e7 olarak, bir \u00e7ocu\u011fun kendisinden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki \u015f\u00fcphe \u00f6\u011frenme a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yeterli kabul edilemeyecektir. Somut olayda; mahkemece, \u00e7ocu\u011fun annesi taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi davas\u0131nda, dava dilek\u00e7esin i\u015f bu davan\u0131n davac\u0131s\u0131na tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi tarihte \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015fse de, yukar\u0131da ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere \u015f\u00fcphe \u00f6\u011frenme anlam\u0131na gelmeyece\u011finden, anne taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan davada DNA incelemesi yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ve sadece annenin \u00e7ocu\u011fun babas\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmesi ile davac\u0131 ile \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131nda kurulan soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kesin ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delille \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi de s\u00f6z konusu olamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi davas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcreyi d\u00fczenleyen 289. maddedeki s\u00fcrenin ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 mahiyetindeki &#8220;\u00f6\u011frenme&#8221; olgusunun hen\u00fcz ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, mahkemece davan\u0131n s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilerek i\u015fin esas\u0131na girilip, DNA testi yap\u0131l\u0131p, t\u00fcm delillerin birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek olu\u015facak sonuca g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekirken, davan\u0131n hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcreden reddi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir. SONU\u00c7 : Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n KALDIRILMASINA, ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA.. karar verili\u2019\u2019<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>2.Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/5886 E. , 2021\/9694 K<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00d6zet:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Olay:<\/strong> Davac\u0131, soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015f ve Adli T\u0131p Kurumu raporu ile babal\u0131k karinesinin \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Yerel Mahkeme Karar\u0131: <\/strong>\u0130lk derece mahkemesi soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Ancak, daval\u0131lar istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015f ve b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi davan\u0131n hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7ti\u011fini gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stererek davay\u0131 usulden reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Mahkeme Karar\u0131:<\/strong> Yarg\u0131tay, davan\u0131n hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcresinin \u00f6\u011frenme tarihine g\u00f6re hesaplanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ve \u015f\u00fcphe ya da s\u00f6ylentilerin \u00f6\u011frenme say\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Somut olayda, hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcrenin ge\u00e7ti\u011fine dair yeterli bir beyan bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in mahkemenin i\u015fin esas\u0131na girerek karar vermesi gerekti\u011fine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle, b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesinin karar\u0131 bozulmu\u015ftur:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8221; Dava soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi istemine ili\u015fkindir. \u0130lk derece mahkemesince Adli T\u0131p kurumu raporu ile sabit oldu\u011fundan davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu h\u00fckme kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015ftur. \u0130stinaf incelemesi yapan b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcrenin ge\u00e7ti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. \u2026.Soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi davas\u0131nda, davan\u0131n hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda ve davan\u0131n temellendirilmesinde belirleyici olan \u201c\u00f6\u011frenmenin\u201d, ne zaman ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi noktas\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcphenin veya s\u00f6ylentinin \u00f6\u011frenme a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yeterli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerinde durulmal\u0131d\u0131r. Yerle\u015fik Yarg\u0131tay uygulamalar\u0131nda, yarg\u0131lama d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda elde edilmi\u015f babal\u0131k raporlar\u0131na \u00f6zellikle hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre niteli\u011findeki dava a\u00e7ma s\u00fcresinin \u00f6\u011frenme tarihinden itibaren ba\u015flamas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte, yani \u00f6\u011frenmenin yarg\u0131lama d\u0131\u015f\u0131 babal\u0131k testi ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi an\u0131nda hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcrenin ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmektedir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131 ile bir \u00e7ocu\u011fun kendisinden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki \u015f\u00fcphe veya s\u00f6ylenti \u00f6\u011frenme a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yeterli kabul edilemeyecektir. Somut olayda, davac\u0131n\u0131n dava dilek\u00e7esinden, a\u015famalardaki beyanlar\u0131ndan ve &#8230; 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesinin 2016\/533 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda yer alan dava dilek\u00e7esi i\u00e7eri\u011finden hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcrenin ge\u00e7ti\u011fini kabule yeterli derecede a\u00e7\u0131k bir beyan bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda mahkemece i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir. SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA, \u2026karar verildi.\u2019\u2019 <\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi davas\u0131, bir \u00e7ocu\u011fun hukuken tan\u0131nan babas\u0131n\u0131n asl\u0131nda biyolojik baba olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispatlamaya y\u00f6nelik a\u00e7\u0131lan bir davad\u0131r. Bu dava, \u00e7ocu\u011fun babas\u0131 oldu\u011funu iddia eden ki\u015finin, babal\u0131k karinesinin \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi amac\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"474\" height=\"410\" class=\"wp-image-1197\" src=\"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/word-image-1194-3.png\" srcset=\"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/word-image-1194-3.png 474w, https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/word-image-1194-3-300x259.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 474px) 100vw, 474px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yaz\u0131l\u0131 bilgiler g\u00fcncellenen mevzuatlar \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde de\u011fi\u015febilir, somut olaya g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirilmesi gereken ba\u015fkaca ko\u015fullar bulunabilir. De\u011fi\u015fen ko\u015fullar ve davalar\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc durumlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 sebebiyle hukuki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar i\u00e7in profesyonel bir destek al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6neriyoruz. <strong>Davan\u0131zla ilgili hukuki s\u00fcrecin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi i\u00e7in avukatl\u0131k hizmetimize ba\u015fvurabilirsiniz.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yaz\u0131l\u0131 bilgiler sebebiyle herhangi bir sorumluluk kabul edilmemektedir.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Reddi Davas\u0131 Soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi davas\u0131, bir \u00e7ocu\u011fun hukuken tan\u0131nan babas\u0131n\u0131n asl\u0131nda biyolojik baba olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispatlamaya y\u00f6nelik a\u00e7\u0131lan bir davad\u0131r. Bu dava, \u00e7ocu\u011fun babas\u0131 oldu\u011funu iddia eden ki\u015finin, babal\u0131k karinesinin \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi amac\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131labilir. \u0130lgili ki\u015filer \u015funlard\u0131r: Koca: Soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi davas\u0131 a\u00e7arak babal\u0131k karinesini \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctebilir. Ana veya \u00c7ocuk: \u00c7ocuk, ana veya di\u011fer ilgililer, babal\u0131k karinesinin \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1195,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1194","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"blocksy_meta":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1194","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1194"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1194\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1458,"href":"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1194\/revisions\/1458"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1195"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1194"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1194"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/referanshukuk.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1194"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}